Categories: Boomers Echo Gen-X Matures Search: Archives: December 2007 November 2007 October 2007

You bet your bippy!- Mature Thoughts

Posted on December 4, 2007

You bet your bippy it would! (That phrase alone would tell you how old I am!)
I may not be the ideal person to answer this because for approximately
50 years (the Adele Davis generation) I have been very aware of the benefits of
good nutrition as well as a full regimen of vitamins.  So take it from
me, the correct nutrition would be a very definite influence on my way
of eating. It’s kept me going on all “fours” for 90 years!

This post was written by jbr8

Local Radio- Mature Thoughts

Posted on November 13, 2007

A few thoughts on how advertising affects me.  I am a great fan of radio at home and in the car.  But I have a very limited listening range. And as much as I love these stations, I am annoyed by advertising in them.

For AM I like WGN in Chicago.  Recently they changed their format to break up the time into even smaller sections.  It seems to me that they are about fifty percent advertising.  I notice this especially on Wed. AM between 7 AM and 8 AM.  At that time Spike O’Dell has his featured guest Paul Green,  professor at Roosevelt 

University and expert on 

Illinois politics.  He is well informed and very entertaining.  Recently WGN changed its format so that Paul Green has about three minutes to talk, wedged in between chatter and commercials.  He just gets going on a topic when they have to break for traffic, sports or whatever.  I get the impression that Dr. Green is frustrated, as he is frequently cut off in mid thought, although  in a cordial way. The station seems to have decided that the audience has a very short attention span, and I am annoyed. I think the audience can tolerate a longer segment by an entertaining and knowlegable expert on local politics.

I also like FM stations, mainly PBS and WFMT, the classical music station in Chicago.  The annoying factor here is pledge week.  This also applies to WTTW, Channel 11, the public television channel.  Each channel has its own annoyance factor.  When I turn into WFMT, the ONLY CLASSICAL MUSIC STATION IN CHICAGO, I want to hear classical music, or perhaps jazz or an interesting talk show.  What I do not want to hear is an hour of appeals for money.  The same annoyance applies to WTTW, Channel !!.  I watch these   unending appeals, and I want to shout; ” I am a member, I contritute, Just stop it!”. 

Perhaps the most annoying commercial intrusion is the category of political commercials.  So far in this seemingly unending presidential primary campaign, we in Illinois have not yet been bombarded by commercials.  It will come, I know, and I feel for the people in Iowa who are enduring this commercial assault. 

But I remember the last election campaign in which there were judges on the ballot.  There was a commercial on TV for a woman running for judge, an Irish name, Margaret Mary something.  Ordinarily I would be interested in voting for her. But these commercials were so frequent and so annoying that I decided that even if she was the most qualified person on the ballot that I would vote against her simply because the commercial was so very annoying.   In this case, the ads had the reverse of the desired effect on me. I don’t know how many others were similarly affected or whether she was elected.

These are the various ways in which I am annoyed by advertising.  I leave it to the experts to analyze and hopefully to change it.  I wish all political advertising could be banned. The money candidates need to raise and spend on ads is scandalous.  The ads tend to be so simplistic, polarizing, not to say expensive.  Couldn’t a candidate say something like “We are not doing commercials. instead we are giving the money to:  ( and list the various worthy causes to be the beneficiary).  But that will never happen.    

I really hate political advertising, and the pressures it puts on candidates to raise money. 

This post was written by Betty Morely

Life in Acadiana - Mature Thoughts

Posted on October 2, 2007

As I contemplate writing about how illegal immigration has affected my life, I look around in the area of Louisiana that I live in, known as Acadiana. There are relatively few Mexicans here, legal or illegal. As of late, we have seen a few at our supermarkets and such. Their demeanor is out of the ordinary only because they are not very friendly compared to the Cajuns and the English-speaking natives of the area. Our public and private facilities, rural or urban, have not been overwhelmed by their presence. Even our colleges and universities have not been figuratively buried by their numbers. Seemingly, their numbers are not so great as to affect our society—yet. Therefore, up to now, our jobs, wages and culture have not been adversely affected to the point of creating financial or cultural adversity to our society.

However, I feel there is an enigma surrounding the comparison between Mexican immigration and the immigration of my ancestors. I am of Canadian/French and Acadian/Cajun descent. My ancestors were forced to immigrate to Louisiana but entered this country LEGALLY. Mexicans are NOT forced to immigrate to the USA, but many are entering this country ILLEGALLY. It seems that Mexican immigrants, legal or illegal, are saturating our nation. For example, when automated telephone menus ask me to press “one” for English or “two” for Spanish, implying that Spanish is the only other language we should acknowledge, I am offended. What about French, the well-established language in this area? If this continues and we become a super-saturated nation, then we are in for a long haul.

This post was written by Mr. Willie Broussard

Yankelovich Comment Policy: Yankelovich encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, libelous, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. Please note that Yankelovich makes reasonable efforts to review all comments prior to posting and Yankelovich may edit comments for clarity or to keep out questionable or off-topic material. All comments should be relevant to the post and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. By submitting your comment, you hereby give Yankelovich the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying information via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity.